Serhiy Holovaty, chairman of the Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe has issued a report with findings from his visit in Bulgaria in November 2008.
“It is my general impression that, in the haste to meet the strenuous accession deadlines, some of the reforms and, in particular, the reform of the judiciary, have undergone numerous “cosmetic changes” that have pushed the reforms in an undesired direction. This was namely the case of the constitutional amendments and the amendments to the Judicial System Act adopted in February 2007.”
He pinpoints three specific problems:
- lengthy preliminary proceedings in the criminal justice system;
- low number of proceedings against high-level officials and civil servants involved in corruption cases;
- non-execution of the Strasbourg Court judgments due to a low rate of reopening of criminal court cases following a judgment of the Strasbourg Court and to the absence of legal provisions enabling to do so in civil cases.
He goes on to say that:
“Bulgaria remains a country with endemic corruption that has gained the ranks of the administration and the judiciary. (…)The weaknesses of the judiciary in Bulgaria have repercussions on most spheres of society which hampers the proper functioning of all democratic institutions.”
Now, it remains to be seen exactly in WHAT political context can the Bulgarian government explain any bias or ill will on behalf of Mr. Holovaty.